Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Cons
    • Release process ? (weekly release will be more complicated due to vote process) (olamy)
    • new committer entry (olamy : IHMO not a real issue as the goal is to probably to move only core)
    • back to svn (AFAIK asf use a central svn repo) (olamy : btw is it a problem ?) (andrew: fwiw, ASF has talked about having a git repo, but no one there has stepped up to get it set up/supported - that may be something we'd be able to help with)
      • Is this really true? Why could we not continue to run with github? Can someone explain what the infrastructure constraints are? (magnayn)
    • legal issues regarding gpl libs (olamy : btw same for eclipse)

...

  • Pros
    • Gets the possibility to join with Hudson again (pablaasmo)
    • Could lead to working closer to the Mylin guys and their Hudson/Jenkins connector (vtintillier)
    • Eclipse projects can use git nowadays (vtintillier)
    • Has a lot of experience to share regarding plugin ecosystems and technology (jutzig)
    • EPL is not MIT compatible (magnayn)
  • Cons
    • Might have more restrictions on how the framework should be. OSGI etc (pablaasmo).
    • Their projects websites are crap and I find them hard to find (vtintillier)
    • If our goal is not to re-unite with Hudson, it's unlikely that Jenkins will be accepted (kutzi)
    • The eclipse IP process makes it very hard for occasional contributors. Many will just give up. (magnayn)

SFC

  • Pros
  • Cons

SPI

  • Pros
  • Cons